How to Build that Broad Coalition NOW by Aryeh Green
Israel Needs a Government of National Purpose, Not Another Narrow Coalition
By Aryeh Green
[Originally published here on The Jerusalem Post, 30 October '26]
Israel desperately needs a broad national government. Not
another narrow coalition held hostage by sectoral parties. Not another election
or government defined primarily as “pro-“ or “anti-Bibi”.
We need a coalition representing the overwhelming majority
of Israelis who agree on the great majority of the strategic issues facing our
country. And we need political leaders willing to put the country's future
ahead of their personal rivalries.
Here’s a plan to do just that.
As others have suggested, Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett, Avigdor
Lieberman, Yair Lapid and, yes, even Yair Golan must reconsider their refusal
to serve in a Netanyahu-led government. The prime minister, in turn, should
accept a genuine national-unity arrangement that includes his retirement from
politics after two years.
Neither side needs to surrender its principles. Both need to
stop making one man's personality the organizing principle of today’s Israeli
politics.
The consensus we ignore
It is a truism, as I've argued
for years, that some 80% of Israelis agree on 90% of the fundamental strategic
issues confronting us.
Across mainstream Zionist parties, there is substantial
agreement on preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, confronting Hamas
and Hezb’Allah, and preventing Gaza or Judea & Samaria from becoming
terrorist strongholds. We may differ on tactics and long-term arrangements; we
do not disagree on the imperative of defending Israel's citizens and
sovereignty.
Most favor a competitive economy, reducing the cost of
living, improving education, integrating all sectors into productive national
life, and preserving Israel as both Jewish and democratic.
Even judicial reform, which nearly tore our society apart,
offers common ground: most agree we need a better-defined balance between the
judiciary, legislature and executive. (Agreement on that objective does not
mean supporting the proposals advanced in 2023 but virtually all opposition
leaders have called publicly for some reform.)
Most urgently, Israelis increasingly recognize that military
or civilian national service must become a shared responsibility. The present
arrangement, in which one sector bears a disproportionate burden while others receive
sweeping exemptions, is unsustainable.
These are serious issues, with genuine differences over
implementation. But they are precisely the differences a responsible governing
coalition should negotiate. And our broad centrist consensus is real.
So why can't we govern together?
Personalities instead of principles
For much of the past three decades, our politics has
revolved around Binyamin Netanyahu. Too many declare “anyone but Bibi” or “only
Bibi”.
One can respect the PM’s considerable contributions to
Israel's security, economy and international standing while also criticizing
his dependence on Haredi (strictly Orthodox) coalition partners, his
discouragement of successors within Likud, and his government's failures,
including those surrounding October 7.
Beyond this, the Haredi political and religious leadership
should have announced on October 8, 2023, that every able-bodied member of
their communities would serve, in the IDF or some essential national capacity. That
they didn’t is on them, but their resistance to meaningful change has been
repeatedly accommodated by Bibi, the Likud and their coalition partners.
Enough already.
The legitimate case against Netanyahu's leadership does not
justify the extreme anti-Bibi rhetoric that has become central to much of our
political discourse. As I wrote
during the judicial reform controversy, rather than arguing the merits of the different
approaches, emotional social-media stampedes turn policy disagreements into
moral panics. Opponents cease to be mistaken fellow citizens; they become
enemies of democracy.
The damage is not abstract. Families divide, friendships
fracture, and the fragile social bonds that enabled Israel not merely to
survive but to thrive are weakened.
The rhetoric is not exclusively a problem of the Left; Bibi's
supporters are not above criticism. But the insistence that no coalition with
Netanyahu is morally permissible has made personal exclusion a substitute for
governing policy.
A two-year agreement to rebuild Israel
There is a practical way forward: a broad Zionist
coalition anchored in a written, public agreement with measurable
commitments and deadlines. This must include:
1.
National security: a
coherent strategy against Iran and its proxies, the disarming and dismantling
of Hamas' military capabilities, and the pursuit of regional diplomatic
opportunities and peace without compromising Israel's security.
2.
Universal service: a
realistic, enforceable framework for military/civilian national service,
including the Haredi and Arab sectors, with clear timetables, powerful
incentives, and consequences for noncompliance – preferably negotiated with and
agreed to by the Haredi and Arab leadership.
3.
Economic and educational
reform: competition, less regulation, lower living costs, core education
for every child, and opportunities for all to participate in our economy.
4.
Judicial and
governmental reform: a negotiated package clarifying the separation of
powers, strengthening democracy by empowering the Knesset while preserving an
independent judiciary, through consensus rather than narrow majority votes.
5.
Accountability for
October 7: an independent inquiry examining the failures of political and
security leadership over time. It need not be designated a “state commission of
inquiry,” but its independence and authority must be beyond serious doubt.
Netanyahu and all other relevant leaders must cooperate fully and accept
scrutiny.
Finally, the agreement should include an explicit leadership
rotation: Netanyahu serves as prime minister for two years, then retires
from politics, with Eisenkot succeeding him for the remainder of the term. This must be a binding commitment, not
another promise to be reconsidered when the moment arrives. The parties would
need to establish the legal and parliamentary arrangements required to make the
rotation credible.
Why Gadi Eisenkot should say yes
Eisenkot would initially serve as vice prime minister and
defense minister, participating at the highest level in decisions on all
policy issues including of course Iran, Gaza and Israel's long-term defense
posture.
For two years, as a relative political novice Eisenkot will
gain invaluable executive, economic and security-cabinet experience,
while demonstrating that he can ‘work the system’ as a politician and not only
succeed in the hierarchical structure of the military. Bennett, Lieberman,
Lapid and other partners would likewise have the opportunity to lead
substantive reforms and share responsibility for their results.
Eisenkot and the others will share credit for the
successes of this broad coalition rather than spend another two years attacking
a government for pursuing policies they and their voters actually support.
Eisenkot would enter the premiership not merely as a critic of Netanyahu, but
as a proven partner in governing, with a record of achievement and a national
mandate for the next phase.
There are risks, of course. No coalition agreement can
guarantee harmony or success, and Eisenkot and others’ supporters will demand
an explanation for reneging on their promises not to sit with Netanyahu.
Here it is: That promise was meant to protect the
country's future, not obstruct it. If these leaders secure universal
service, national security, accountability for October 7, credible judicial
reform, and a firm date for Netanyahu's departure, they will have achieved far
more than another round of personal denunciations could deliver.
Netanyahu also has to relinquish his reliance on narrow
sectoral parties and commit to an orderly exit from political life. In return,
he could help leave behind a more united and better-governed Israel—a legacy
worth considerably more than another two years of political survival.
A coalition for the country
Such a government should be broad enough to include parties
from the Zionist Left to the religious Right, provided they accept its
governing program. It should not depend on non-Zionist or anti-Zionist sectoral
parties holding the national agenda hostage. This is not an argument for
excluding Arab or Haredi citizens; their fuller integration and equal
opportunity should be among the government's highest priorities.
I worked with Natan Sharansky when Yisrael B'Aliya promoted
a pragmatic, centrist approach to politics. Over the years I've voted across
the political spectrum, judging parties by their principles and policies, their
people and their pronouncements, not by personalities or polling. I have never believed that loyalty to a
politician should outweigh loyalty to the country.
In my new book Finding
Peace in the Promised Land, I argue that moving from hostility towards
acceptance, forgiveness and shared purpose is essential to lasting peace
between Israel and our Arab neighbors. Surely we can apply the same principles
among ourselves.
Our reservists did not ask one another how they voted before
fighting together after October 7. Religious and secular, Left and Right,
Netanyahu supporters and opponents defended this country side by side.
If our soldiers can fight together, surely our
politicians can govern together.
The question is whether they
have the courage to do so.
Aryeh Green is the author of
the recent Finding Peace in the Promised Land as well as My Israel Trail. A former senior
advisor to Natan Sharansky in Israel’s prime minister’s office, Green is a
well-known speaker, writer, business executive and democracy activist, and the
co-founder of US nonprofit Gigawatt Impact bringing renewable energy to Africa.
He can be reached at aryeh.green@gmail.com.
Comments